20 °F Ocean City, US
December 14, 2025

Billboard lawsuit advances against Somers Point Zoning Board ruling

SOMERS POINT — City Council met in executive session Jan. 11 to discuss a complaint against the Zoning Board for denying an application to erect a 45-foot-tall billboard at a busy intersection.

Garden State Outdoor LLC accuses the Zoning Board of wrongly denying a use variance and other relief sought to allow the digital billboard between Somers Point Diner and Diorio’s Circle Cafe near the four-way intersection of MacArthur Boulevard, Shore Road, Route 52 and Somers Point-Mays Landing Road.

The suit states Garden State has a lease to erect the billboard at 8 MacArthur Blvd., site of the diner owned by the Exadaktilos family.

On Dec. 14, John Exadaktilos, son of the owners and a restaurateur himself, accused City Councilman Sean McGuigan of trying to strong-arm him into giving up plans for the billboard.

Exadaktilos alleged McGuigan committed official misconduct by threatening to take parking spaces away from the restaurant if he did not forego his plans. 

City Council also was to discuss anticipated litigation involving a tort claims notice served on the city by Garden State Outdoor on Dec. 14, 2023.

Garden State applied to the Zoning Board on Oct. 25, 2022. The application requested a use variance, height variance and bulk variance relief. 

The complaint also alleges the city has an “unconstitutional ban” on billboards, stating the city cannot limit content. The suit states the billboard would be for all forms of content and not solely commercial and that Somers Point’s zoning ordinance limits advertising to the business or use on the property. It claims content-based discrimination in violation of the First Amendment.

Somers Point argues that a secondary business on the property is barred by municipal ordinance and that the city’s sign ordinance is not content-based discrimination because it is narrowly tailored so as not to be so. 

In addition, the city argues digital billboards of the size requested are “an intrusive invasion upon the landscape” as well as its “promotion of a desirable visual environment and retention of the character of the community.”

The next court date, a petition hearing, is scheduled for Feb. 15 before Judge Dean R. Marcolongo.

By CRAIG D. SCHENCK/Sentinel staff

Related articles

Dredging moves forward after another debate

Council members feel they were set up, but vote for survey contract By DAVID NAHAN/Sentinel staff OCEAN CITY – A spirited debate sidelined a vote June 24 on a contract for ACT Engineers to get on track with bay and lagoon dredging, but a week later council voted 6-1 to approve that contract. The contract is […]

Seeking fourth term as mayor, Gillian wants to do even more for Ocean City

OCEAN CITY – With the Wonderland Pier carousel in the background and a large contingent of supporters in front of him, Ocean City Mayor Jay Gillian formally announced his re-election campaign Sunday afternoon. The resort native and 1983 graduate of Ocean City High School said he has dedicated his life to the community and after […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *